Update faq.rst
Edited faq to recommend umap above umapr, as the maintainers of umapr themselves have been pointing users towards umap. Also changed capitalization of the package names to be in line with the official CRAN names of the packages.
@@ -121,14 +121,20 @@ available to R users.
If you want to use the reference
implementation under the hood but want a nice R interface
-the we recommend `umapr <https://github.com/ropenscilabs/umapr>`_
-which wraps the python code with reticulate.
-
-If you want a pure R version then there are a couple
-of options: `UMAP <https://github.com/tkonopka/umap>`_
-and `UWOT <https://github.com/jlmelville/uwot>`_. Both are good
-reimplementations of UMAP in R. If performance is
-a major factor we recommend UWOT at this time.
+then we recommend `umap <https://github.com/tkonopka/umap>`_,
+which wraps the python code with
+`reticulate <https://rstudio.github.io/reticulate/>`_.
+Another reticulate interface is
+`umapr <https://github.com/ropenscilabs/umapr>`_, but it
+may not be under active development.
+
+If you want a pure R version then we recommend
+`uwot <https://github.com/jlmelville/uwot>`_ at this time.
+`umap <https://github.com/tkonopka/umap>`_ also provides
+a pure R implementation in addition to its reticulate
+wrapper.
+
+Both umap and uwot are available on CRAN.
Is there a C/C++ implementation?
--------------------------------
