Use SKIP_SLOW in alma, too
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ from .. import Alma
# ALMA tests involving staging take too long, leading to travis timeouts
# TODO: make this a configuration item
-SKIP_STAGING = True
+SKIP_SLOW = True
all_colnames = {'Project code', 'Source name', 'RA', 'Dec', 'Band',
'Frequency resolution', 'Integration', 'Release date',
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ class TestAlma:
# assert b'2011.0.00217.S' in result_c['Project code'] # missing cycle 1 data
assert b'2012.1.00932.S' in result_c['Project code']
- @pytest.mark.skipif("SKIP_STAGING")
+ @pytest.mark.skipif("SKIP_SLOW")
def test_m83(self, temp_dir, recwarn):
alma = Alma()
alma.cache_location = temp_dir
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ class TestAlma:
# 'same UIDs, the result returned is probably correct,'
# ' otherwise you may need to create a fresh astroquery.Alma instance.'))
- @pytest.mark.skipif("SKIP_STAGING")
+ @pytest.mark.skipif("SKIP_SLOW")
def test_stage_data(self, temp_dir, recwarn):
alma = Alma()
alma.cache_location = temp_dir
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ class TestAlma:
# 'same UIDs, the result returned is probably correct,'
# ' otherwise you may need to create a fresh astroquery.Alma instance.'))
- @pytest.mark.skipif("SKIP_STAGING")
+ @pytest.mark.skipif("SKIP_SLOW")
def test_doc_example(self, temp_dir):
alma = Alma()
alma.cache_location = temp_dir
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ class TestAlma:
# This has been reported, as it is definitely a bug.
@pytest.mark.xfail
@pytest.mark.bigdata
- @pytest.mark.skipif("SKIP_STAGING")
+ @pytest.mark.skipif("SKIP_SLOW")
def test_cycle1(self, temp_dir):
# About 500 MB
alma = Alma()
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ class TestAlma:
assert len(data) == 6
- @pytest.mark.skipif("SKIP_STAGING")
+ @pytest.mark.skipif("SKIP_SLOW")
def test_cycle0(self, temp_dir):
# About 20 MB
