Move label descriptions to a separate file
@@ -121,74 +121,4 @@ Issue tracking
Issues with the Matrix specification are tracked in `GitHub
<https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues>`_.
-The following labels are used to help categorize issues:
-
-`spec-omission <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/labels/spec-omission>`_
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Things which have been implemented but not currently specified. These may range
-from entire API endpoints, to particular options or return parameters.
-
-Issues with this label will have been implemented in `Synapse
-<https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse>`_. Normally there will be a design
-document in Google Docs or similar which describes the feature.
-
-Examples:
-
-* `Spec PUT /directory/list <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/417>`_
-* `Unspec'd server_name request param for /join/{roomIdOrAlias}
- <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/904>`_
-
-`clarification <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/labels/clarification>`_
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-An area where the spec could do with being more explicit.
-
-Examples:
-
-* `Spec the implicit limit on /syncs
- <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/708>`_
-
-* `Clarify the meaning of the currently_active flags in presence events
- <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/686>`_
-
-`spec-bug <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/labels/spec-bug>`_
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Something which is in the spec, but is wrong.
-
-Note: this is *not* for things that are badly designed or don't work well
-(for which see 'improvement' or 'feature') - it is for places where the
-spec doesn't match reality.
-
-Examples:
-
-* `swagger is wrong for directory PUT
- <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/933>`_
-
-* `receipts section still refers to initialSync
- <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/695>`_
-
-`improvement <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/labels/improvement>`_
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-A suggestion for a relatively simple improvement to the protocol.
-
-Examples:
-
-* `We need a 'remove 3PID' API so that users can remove mappings
- <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/620>`_
-* `We should mandate that /publicRooms requires an access_token
- <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/612>`_
-
-`feature <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/labels/feature>`_
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-A suggestion for a significant extension to the matrix protocol which
-needs considerable consideration before implementation.
-
-Examples:
-
-* `Peer-to-peer Matrix <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/710>`_
-* `Specify a means for clients to "edit" previous messages
- <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/682>`_
+See `meta/labels.rst <meta/labels.rst>`_ for notes on what the labels mean.
