Datasets:
uid string | dataset_id string | jurisdiction string | court_level string | year int64 | area_of_law string | pillar string | series string | input_case_position_summary string | input_email_facts_relied string | input_risk_analysis string | input_options_presented string | input_recommendation string | input_client_instruction_record string | input_internal_consistency_flags string | question string | ground_truth_label string | ground_truth_rationale string | outcome_signal string | early_window_months int64 | source_citation string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AE-TR-001 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Pre-Litigation | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Claim for unpaid invoice | Invoice due 1 May unpaid reminders sent | Risk of defence low. Recovery likely with costs | Issue claim or send final demand | Recommend issue claim | Client instructs issue claim | Consistent with file | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Advice risks options and instruction align. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-002 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Pre-Litigation | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Invoice dispute | Facts unclear | No risk analysis given | Only one option stated | Recommend settlement without basis | No instruction recorded | Contradiction with file | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Missing risk options and instruction with contradiction. | misadvice_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-003 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Retaliation claim | Complaint and termination dates set out | Risk moderate. Employer may contest causation | File claim or attempt settlement | Recommend settlement discussion | Client agrees attempt settlement | Consistent | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Email aligns facts risk options and instruction. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-004 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Retaliation claim | Facts support claim | No risk explanation | Only option litigate | Recommend withdraw claim | Instruction missing | Contradiction | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Recommendation contradicts facts and no instruction. | misadvice_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-005 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3B | Disrepair claim | Damp and repair notices listed | Risk of delay in repair enforcement | Send protocol letter or issue claim | Recommend protocol letter first | Client instructs send letter | Consistent | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Advice and instruction consistent. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-006 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3B | Disrepair | Facts thin | No risks stated | No options listed | Recommend urgent claim | Instruction unclear | Inconsistent | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Missing risks options and instruction. | misadvice_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-007 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | EU | Commercial | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Contract termination dispute | Termination clause facts | Risk counterclaim possible | Negotiate or litigate | Recommend negotiate | Client instructs negotiate | Consistent | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Complete advice loop. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-008 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | EU | Commercial | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Contract termination | Facts partial | Risk overstated | Only one option given | Recommend terminate | Instruction contradicts | Contradiction | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Advice inconsistent with facts and instruction. | misadvice_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-009 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Unfair dismissal | Procedure defects noted | Risk of partial success | File claim or negotiate | Recommend file claim | Client instructs file claim | Consistent | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Advice risks options and instruction align. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-010 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Discrimination | Facts unclear | No risk analysis | No options | Recommend withdraw | Instruction not recorded | Inconsistent | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Incomplete advice and missing instruction. | misadvice_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
What this dataset does
You receive
case position facts used risk analysis options recommendation client instruction consistency flags
You decide
coherent or incoherent
Daily use
advice QC
risk gap detection
instruction capture check
contradiction flag
- Downloads last month
- 10