File size: 44,783 Bytes
0d00d62 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 |
{
"title": "Voting Ensemble Mastery: 100 MCQs",
"description": "A complete MCQ set on Voting Ensemble Methods — covering hard and soft voting, use-cases, advantages, limitations, and real-world scenario questions.",
"questions": [
{
"id": 1,
"questionText": "What is the core idea of a Voting Ensemble?",
"options": [
"Train a single strong model",
"Perform dimensionality reduction",
"Reduce dataset size",
"Combine predictions from multiple models"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Voting Ensembling combines predictions from multiple models to improve overall accuracy."
},
{
"id": 2,
"questionText": "What are the two main types of Voting?",
"options": [
"Bagging and Boosting",
"Static and Dynamic Voting",
"Linear and Non-linear Voting",
"Hard and Soft Voting"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Voting Ensembles are primarily divided into Hard Voting and Soft Voting methods."
},
{
"id": 3,
"questionText": "What does Hard Voting use to make the final prediction?",
"options": [
"Highest loss",
"Majority class vote",
"Average probabilities",
"Gradient values"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Hard Voting chooses the class that appears most frequently among model predictions."
},
{
"id": 4,
"questionText": "Soft Voting makes predictions based on:",
"options": [
"Averaging class probabilities",
"Majority class votes",
"Random selection",
"Model with highest accuracy only"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 0,
"explanation": "Soft Voting averages probabilities from all models and selects the class with the highest probability."
},
{
"id": 5,
"questionText": "Soft Voting requires that base models must:",
"options": [
"Have the same accuracy",
"Output raw labels",
"Output probability scores",
"Be decision trees only"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Soft Voting needs probability outputs like `predict_proba()` — not just class labels."
},
{
"id": 6,
"questionText": "What is the minimum number of models required for a Voting Ensemble?",
"options": [
"3",
"1",
"2",
"No minimum"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "At least 2 models are required to perform any kind of voting."
},
{
"id": 7,
"questionText": "What is the purpose of using multiple models in Voting?",
"options": [
"To combine strengths of different models",
"To reduce dataset size",
"To increase bias",
"To make training faster"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 0,
"explanation": "Voting combines multiple models to leverage their strengths and improve prediction reliability."
},
{
"id": 8,
"questionText": "In Hard Voting, what happens if there is a tie between class predictions?",
"options": [
"First class is selected",
"Depends on implementation",
"Model with highest accuracy is selected",
"Random class is selected"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Tie handling is implementation-dependent and varies across libraries."
},
{
"id": 9,
"questionText": "Which Voting method performs better when base models are calibrated and output probabilities?",
"options": [
"Soft Voting",
"Hard Voting",
"Rule-based Voting",
"Random Voting"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 0,
"explanation": "Soft Voting uses probability averaging — works best with well-calibrated models."
},
{
"id": 10,
"questionText": "Which of the following is a key advantage of Voting over a single model?",
"options": [
"Requires less computation",
"Better generalization",
"Always 100% accuracy",
"No need for tuning"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Voting reduces the chance of overfitting and improves generalization performance."
},
{
"id": 11,
"questionText": "Which type of Voting is preferred when class probabilities are reliable?",
"options": [
"Bootstrap Voting",
"Soft Voting",
"Random Voting",
"Hard Voting"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Soft Voting utilizes probability outputs effectively when they are calibrated."
},
{
"id": 12,
"questionText": "What is a requirement for models in Soft Voting?",
"options": [
"All models must be trees",
"All models must be neural networks",
"All models must use same hyperparameters",
"All models must output probability scores"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Soft Voting needs probability scores using functions like `predict_proba()`."
},
{
"id": 13,
"questionText": "Which is true about Voting Ensembles?",
"options": [
"They are only used for regression",
"They must use only identical models",
"They reduce overfitting by aggregating independent models",
"They eliminate the need for feature engineering"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Voting reduces overfitting by combining diverse independent models."
},
{
"id": 14,
"questionText": "What type of models can be used inside a Voting Ensemble?",
"options": [
"Only decision trees",
"Only SVM",
"Any mix of models (heterogeneous)",
"Only neural networks"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Voting can combine diverse models like SVM, Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, etc."
},
{
"id": 15,
"questionText": "Which problem type is Voting Ensemble typically used for?",
"options": [
"Only regression",
"Only classification",
"Both classification and regression",
"Only clustering"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Voting is mainly used for classification, but can also be extended to regression."
},
{
"id": 16,
"questionText": "In Hard Voting, how is the final class decided?",
"options": [
"By averaging probabilities",
"By selecting random model output",
"By selecting highest confidence model",
"By selecting majority voted class labels"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Hard Voting simply picks the class label that gets majority votes."
},
{
"id": 17,
"questionText": "Which of the following is a limitation of Voting?",
"options": [
"Always requires GPUs",
"Not interpretable easily",
"Can be used only with CNNs",
"Cannot handle classification tasks"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Since multiple models are used, analyzing why a prediction was made becomes harder."
},
{
"id": 18,
"questionText": "Which is true for Hard Voting?",
"options": [
"Requires all models to be identical",
"Needs only class labels",
"Slower than Soft Voting",
"Uses probabilities"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Hard Voting only needs class labels like 0/1, not probabilities."
},
{
"id": 19,
"questionText": "Is it possible to combine Logistic Regression, SVM, and Random Forest in a Voting Ensemble?",
"options": [
"Only if dataset is small",
"Yes, heterogeneous models are allowed",
"Only if all are deep learning models",
"No, all models must be same type"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Voting allows combining different model families for better performance."
},
{
"id": 20,
"questionText": "What does Soft Voting average?",
"options": [
"Model parameters",
"Raw model inputs",
"Dataset rows",
"Predicted class probabilities"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Soft Voting averages probability outputs, then selects highest probability class."
},
{
"id": 21,
"questionText": "Which library provides VotingClassifier in Python?",
"options": [
"NumPy",
"PyTorch",
"scikit-learn",
"TensorFlow"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "scikit-learn provides VotingClassifier for ensembling models."
},
{
"id": 22,
"questionText": "Which voting type is more robust against noisy class probability estimations?",
"options": [
"Hard Voting",
"Soft Voting",
"None",
"Random Voting"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 0,
"explanation": "Hard Voting is safer when probabilities are unreliable or poorly calibrated."
},
{
"id": 23,
"questionText": "Can Voting Ensembles improve stability of model predictions?",
"options": [
"Only for time series",
"Yes, by reducing variance",
"Only in regression",
"No, increases randomness"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Voting helps reduce variance by averaging multiple predictions."
},
{
"id": 24,
"questionText": "If models strongly disagree in Hard Voting, what happens?",
"options": [
"Soft Voting is automatically used",
"Prediction becomes unstable",
"Voting skips such cases",
"It stops training"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "High disagreement can reduce prediction confidence and stability."
},
{
"id": 25,
"questionText": "What happens if one weak model is added to Soft Voting?",
"options": [
"No effect at all",
"Causes overfitting immediately",
"Always improves accuracy",
"Can reduce overall performance"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Soft Voting averages probabilities — a weak noisy model can hurt accuracy."
},
{
"id": 26,
"questionText": "What is the main difference between Bagging and Voting?",
"options": [
"Bagging is only for regression",
"Voting always boosts performance, Bagging does not",
"Voting uses different model types, Bagging uses same model type",
"Voting needs large datasets only"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Voting is heterogeneous by nature; Bagging generally uses the same model type with data bootstrapping."
},
{
"id": 27,
"questionText": "Which statement is true about Hard Voting?",
"options": [
"It uses average probability",
"It trains models sequentially",
"It requires all models to be deep learning models",
"It selects the majority class label"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Hard voting picks the class label that appears most frequently among model predictions."
},
{
"id": 28,
"questionText": "Soft Voting is more reliable than Hard Voting when:",
"options": [
"The dataset is extremely small",
"Model probabilities are well-calibrated",
"Using only one model",
"Class labels are noisy"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Soft voting performs best when model probability outputs are accurate."
},
{
"id": 29,
"questionText": "Which of the following is a key advantage of Soft Voting?",
"options": [
"Avoids probability calculations entirely",
"Can weigh models differently using probabilities",
"Only works with random forests",
"Does not need probability estimates"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Soft voting can assign more importance to stronger models using weighted averaging."
},
{
"id": 30,
"questionText": "Voting Ensemble works best when base models are:",
"options": [
"From the same algorithm",
"Poorly trained",
"Highly correlated",
"Diverse and independent"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Model diversity ensures different error patterns, improving ensemble performance."
},
{
"id": 31,
"questionText": "In Voting Ensemble, combining Logistic Regression, SVM, and Decision Tree is an example of:",
"options": [
"Bagging",
"Sequential ensemble",
"Heterogeneous ensemble",
"Homogeneous ensemble"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Using different types of models is called a heterogeneous ensemble."
},
{
"id": 32,
"questionText": "Which type of Voting allows assigning more importance to better-performing models?",
"options": [
"Uniform Voting",
"Random Voting",
"Hard Voting",
"Soft Voting with weights"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Soft voting supports weighting individual models based on performance."
},
{
"id": 33,
"questionText": "What happens if one model in a Voting Ensemble consistently gives wrong predictions?",
"options": [
"It fully controls the final output",
"It stops the ensemble from working",
"It improves accuracy",
"It slightly decreases overall accuracy"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "A weak model can slightly hurt performance but often the ensemble still performs well."
},
{
"id": 34,
"questionText": "Which Voting method is more interpretable regarding final decision logic?",
"options": [
"Both equally",
"None",
"Hard Voting",
"Soft Voting"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Hard voting decisions can be directly traced to majority class votes."
},
{
"id": 35,
"questionText": "Soft Voting may underperform if:",
"options": [
"Models are shallow",
"All models agree",
"Models don't output probabilities",
"Dataset is small"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Soft voting requires probability outputs like predict_proba()."
},
{
"id": 36,
"questionText": "Which of these is a REAL requirement for Soft Voting?",
"options": [
"All models must be trees",
"All models must be neural networks",
"All models must output class probabilities",
"All models must have same accuracy"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Soft voting requires probability estimates — no need for same accuracy or model type."
},
{
"id": 37,
"questionText": "Voting Ensembles improve performance mainly by reducing:",
"options": [
"Bias",
"Training time",
"Variance",
"Dataset size"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Voting helps reduce the variance of predictions by averaging model outputs."
},
{
"id": 38,
"questionText": "Which is a potential DISADVANTAGE of Voting Ensembles?",
"options": [
"Cannot be used for classification",
"Hard to interpret final decisions",
"Must use same model type",
"Only works for regression"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Since multiple models influence the result, interpretability decreases."
},
{
"id": 39,
"questionText": "Voting Ensemble is MOST helpful when individual models:",
"options": [
"Have identical predictions",
"Use the same algorithm and parameters",
"Are all overfitted",
"Make complementary errors"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Ensemble works best when models compensate for each other's errors."
},
{
"id": 40,
"questionText": "Which scenario best fits using Voting Ensemble?",
"options": [
"Multiple trained models with decent accuracy",
"Highly imbalanced dataset with no labels",
"Real-time system with tight latency constraint",
"Only one extremely accurate model"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 0,
"explanation": "Voting is useful when several decent but imperfect models are available."
},
{
"id": 41,
"questionText": "Which of the following is TRUE about weighting in Soft Voting?",
"options": [
"Weights decrease ensemble accuracy always",
"Weights are randomly assigned",
"Weights are only used in Hard Voting",
"Weights allow stronger models to influence more"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Weights in Soft Voting help give preference to stronger models."
},
{
"id": 42,
"questionText": "Hard Voting is most effective when:",
"options": [
"Models produce random outputs",
"Dataset is unsupervised",
"Class labels from models are stable",
"Probabilities are reliable"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Hard voting is useful when class labels are confidently predicted."
},
{
"id": 43,
"questionText": "Which approach improves Soft Voting performance?",
"options": [
"Avoid probability averaging",
"Use uncalibrated probability models",
"Use calibrated probability models",
"Remove probability outputs"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Soft voting needs properly calibrated probability outputs for reliability."
},
{
"id": 44,
"questionText": "In voting, which models are preferred for maximum accuracy gain?",
"options": [
"Strong but diverse models",
"Extremely similar models",
"Very weak models only",
"Highly correlated models"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 0,
"explanation": "Diversity ensures different error patterns, maximizing ensemble accuracy."
},
{
"id": 45,
"questionText": "What is a potential RISK of including too many models in a Voting Ensemble?",
"options": [
"Loss of supervised learning",
"Higher computation and latency",
"Automatic model deletion",
"Overfitting on test data"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Too many models increase compute cost and response time."
},
{
"id": 46,
"questionText": "Which situation can DEGRADE Voting Ensemble performance?",
"options": [
"Using only calibrated probability models",
"Adding several almost identical models",
"Combining different feature extractors",
"Adding multiple weak uncorrelated learners"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Redundant identical models bring no diversity and give no benefit."
},
{
"id": 47,
"questionText": "Soft Voting is preferred over Hard Voting when:",
"options": [
"Only labels are needed",
"No model supports probability output",
"Probability outputs are reliable",
"Models are identical"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Soft voting requires accurate probability outputs for better performance."
},
{
"id": 48,
"questionText": "If accuracy of individual models is low but different mistakes are made, Voting can still:",
"options": [
"Stop working",
"Always fail",
"Outperform individual models",
"Perform worse than all models"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Ensemble effect combines different strengths, even if individual accuracy is modest."
},
{
"id": 49,
"questionText": "Which type of dataset benefits MOST from Voting Ensemble?",
"options": [
"Large and diverse structured data",
"Purely unstructured images only",
"Datasets with no labels",
"Dataset with only one feature"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 0,
"explanation": "Voting is very effective in structured tabular data problems."
},
{
"id": 50,
"questionText": "Which metric is NOT directly improved by Voting Ensemble?",
"options": [
"Robustness",
"Stability",
"Training speed",
"Generalization"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Voting increases computation; it does not accelerate training."
},
{
"id": 51,
"questionText": "Medium-Level: Soft Voting gives better performance over Hard Voting when:",
"options": [
"Model diversity does not exist",
"Ensemble contains a single model",
"Model probabilities are well calibrated",
"Models only provide class labels"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Soft voting leverages probability information, so accurate calibrated probabilities improve performance."
},
{
"id": 52,
"questionText": "Which strategy improves Voting Ensemble performance?",
"options": [
"Using only identical models",
"Skipping data preprocessing",
"Blending diverse model architectures",
"Ignoring validation scores"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Diversity among models boosts ensemble power significantly."
},
{
"id": 53,
"questionText": "Voting Ensemble can fail if base models are:",
"options": [
"Moderately accurate",
"Trained on different features",
"Diverse and independent",
"Highly correlated with similar errors"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "If base models make similar errors, voting does not reduce errors effectively."
},
{
"id": 54,
"questionText": "Soft Voting with weights allows:",
"options": [
"Random selection of predictions",
"Ignore weaker models completely",
"Greater influence for stronger models",
"Equal influence for all models"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Weights in Soft Voting give more importance to better-performing models."
},
{
"id": 55,
"questionText": "Hard Voting is more robust when:",
"options": [
"The dataset is very large",
"Individual model predictions are noisy",
"There is only one base model",
"Model probabilities are perfect"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Hard Voting reduces sensitivity to probability estimation errors by using majority votes."
},
{
"id": 56,
"questionText": "Which scenario is best suited for a Voting Ensemble?",
"options": [
"Several moderately performing models with different strengths exist",
"All models are identical",
"Only one high-performing model is available",
"Dataset has no labels"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 0,
"explanation": "Voting leverages complementary predictions from multiple models to improve accuracy."
},
{
"id": 57,
"questionText": "When combining models in Voting, diversity helps to:",
"options": [
"Decrease overall variance",
"Reduce dataset size",
"Increase bias",
"Accelerate training"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 0,
"explanation": "Diverse models make different errors, which are averaged out, reducing variance."
},
{
"id": 58,
"questionText": "Adding very weak models to a Voting Ensemble can:",
"options": [
"Have no effect",
"Always improve accuracy",
"Slightly reduce overall performance",
"Break the ensemble"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Weak models may introduce noise and slightly lower ensemble accuracy."
},
{
"id": 59,
"questionText": "In a Voting Ensemble, tie-breaking in Hard Voting depends on:",
"options": [
"Number of features",
"Probability outputs",
"Implementation details",
"Dataset size"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Hard Voting tie-handling is usually implementation-specific."
},
{
"id": 60,
"questionText": "Voting Ensemble helps improve:",
"options": [
"Underfitting only",
"Training speed",
"Generalization and robustness",
"Overfitting only"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "By combining multiple models, ensembles improve generalization and reduce sensitivity to noise."
},
{
"id": 61,
"questionText": "Which base models can be combined in a Voting Ensemble?",
"options": [
"Any heterogeneous or homogeneous models",
"Only neural networks",
"Only decision trees",
"Only linear models"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 0,
"explanation": "Voting allows combining different model types for better ensemble performance."
},
{
"id": 62,
"questionText": "Medium Level: If one base model in Soft Voting produces biased probabilities, the ensemble will:",
"options": [
"Ignore the model automatically",
"Switch to Hard Voting",
"Always fail",
"Average out if others are unbiased"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Soft Voting averages probabilities, so other unbiased models can compensate for one biased model."
},
{
"id": 63,
"questionText": "Scenario: You have three classifiers, two strong and one weak. Soft Voting is used. Which is true?",
"options": [
"Soft Voting ignores weak models",
"Strong models have greater influence if weighted",
"All models have equal effect regardless of performance",
"Weak model dominates ensemble"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Weighted Soft Voting allows strong models to have higher influence on the final prediction."
},
{
"id": 64,
"questionText": "Scenario: A Voting Ensemble has low diversity. Expected outcome?",
"options": [
"Significant increase in accuracy",
"Low improvement over individual models",
"High variance reduction",
"Ensemble stops working"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Without diversity, models make similar errors and the ensemble gains little benefit."
},
{
"id": 65,
"questionText": "Medium Level: How to handle class imbalance in Voting Ensemble?",
"options": [
"Ignore imbalance",
"Remove minority class",
"Use class weighting or balanced sampling in base models",
"Only use Hard Voting"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Adjusting base models to handle class imbalance ensures the ensemble is not biased."
},
{
"id": 66,
"questionText": "Scenario: Soft Voting probabilities differ in scale among models. Recommended step?",
"options": [
"Remove some models",
"Use only Hard Voting",
"Normalize probabilities before averaging",
"Ignore scaling differences"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Scaling ensures probabilities are comparable before combining in Soft Voting."
},
{
"id": 67,
"questionText": "Scenario: Voting Ensemble shows unstable predictions on edge cases. Likely reason?",
"options": [
"Using Hard Voting",
"Training dataset too large",
"Too many base models",
"Insufficient diversity in base models"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Lack of diversity leads to correlated errors, causing instability."
},
{
"id": 68,
"questionText": "Scenario: You want a lightweight Voting model for real-time use. Best practice?",
"options": [
"Ignore computation constraints",
"Add more complex models",
"Reduce number of base models and simplify them",
"Use Soft Voting only"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Fewer and simpler models reduce latency while maintaining reasonable ensemble performance."
},
{
"id": 69,
"questionText": "Scenario: Hard Voting ensemble has many ties. Recommended action?",
"options": [
"Remove base models",
"Switch to Soft Voting or assign weights",
"Keep Hard Voting as is",
"Randomly select predictions"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Soft Voting or weighting reduces the effect of ties and improves reliability."
},
{
"id": 70,
"questionText": "Scenario: You combine Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and SVM using Soft Voting. Test accuracy is lower than best base model. Possible causes?",
"options": [
"Soft Voting always underperforms",
"Random initialization of models",
"Improper probability calibration or correlated errors",
"Training data too large"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Soft Voting performance depends on probability calibration and diversity among base models."
},
{
"id": 71,
"questionText": "Hard Voting vs Soft Voting: Which is better for well-calibrated probabilistic outputs?",
"options": [
"Neither",
"Both equal",
"Soft Voting",
"Hard Voting"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Soft Voting leverages probability outputs and generally performs better with well-calibrated models."
},
{
"id": 72,
"questionText": "Scenario: One base model in a Voting Ensemble fails completely on new data. Ensemble effect?",
"options": [
"Hard Voting stops working",
"Soft Voting averages can reduce impact",
"Ensemble accuracy drops to zero",
"All models ignored"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Soft Voting can mitigate the effect of one failing model by averaging with other models' outputs."
},
{
"id": 73,
"questionText": "Scenario: Ensemble predictions fluctuate across runs. Likely cause?",
"options": [
"Multiple base models",
"Random initialization of base models",
"High dataset diversity",
"Using Soft Voting"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Randomness in training some base models can cause prediction fluctuations."
},
{
"id": 74,
"questionText": "Scenario: Weighted Soft Voting used incorrectly. What could happen?",
"options": [
"Hard Voting automatically applies",
"Strong models underrepresented, ensemble underperforms",
"Ensemble accuracy always increases",
"Base models ignored"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Incorrect weighting can reduce the influence of stronger models, decreasing ensemble performance."
},
{
"id": 75,
"questionText": "Scenario: Using Soft Voting with outputs on different scales. What to do?",
"options": [
"Randomly select one model",
"Use Hard Voting",
"Normalize probabilities",
"Ignore scaling"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Normalizing probabilities ensures a fair contribution from all models."
},
{
"id": 76,
"questionText": "Scenario: Ensemble overfits on training data. Recommended solution?",
"options": [
"Ignore ensemble and use single model",
"Use cross-validation and consider reducing base models or regularizing them",
"Switch to Hard Voting only",
"Add more weak models"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Proper cross-validation and controlling base model complexity help prevent overfitting."
},
{
"id": 77,
"questionText": "Scenario: Voting Ensemble performs worse than individual models. Likely reason?",
"options": [
"Voting always underperforms",
"Dataset too large",
"Using Soft Voting automatically fails",
"Base models highly correlated or weak"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Ensemble benefits only arise when base models are diverse and reasonably accurate."
},
{
"id": 78,
"questionText": "Scenario: Ensemble used for imbalanced classification. Which strategy helps?",
"options": [
"Ignore class imbalance",
"Class weighting or balanced sampling in base models",
"Remove minority classes",
"Use Hard Voting only"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Adjusting base models for imbalance ensures ensemble predictions are not biased."
},
{
"id": 79,
"questionText": "Scenario: Adding highly similar base models. Ensemble outcome?",
"options": [
"Maximum accuracy gain",
"Soft Voting fails",
"Little to no improvement",
"Hard Voting fails"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Similar models add redundancy, giving minimal benefit to the ensemble."
},
{
"id": 80,
"questionText": "Scenario: Ensemble shows different accuracy across runs. Most likely reason?",
"options": [
"Hard Voting always fluctuates",
"Soft Voting inherently unstable",
"Randomness in training base models",
"Dataset size too small"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Random initialization or stochastic training of base models causes variance across runs."
},
{
"id": 81,
"questionText": "Scenario: You need an ensemble for high-risk decisions where errors are costly. Best approach?",
"options": [
"Random Voting",
"Hard Voting with weak models",
"Weighted Soft Voting with strong base models",
"Single uncalibrated model"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Weighted Soft Voting emphasizes reliable models and reduces error in critical decisions."
},
{
"id": 82,
"questionText": "Scenario: You combine models trained on overlapping features. Risk?",
"options": [
"Soft Voting ignored",
"Ensemble fails to produce output",
"Highly correlated errors, reduced ensemble benefit",
"Maximum ensemble improvement"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Correlated errors reduce the variance reduction benefit of the ensemble."
},
{
"id": 83,
"questionText": "Scenario: One model outputs extreme probabilities. Soft Voting effect?",
"options": [
"Hard Voting preferred",
"May skew average unless weights or normalization applied",
"Has no effect",
"Automatically corrected"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Extreme probabilities can dominate averaging; normalization or weights correct this."
},
{
"id": 84,
"questionText": "Scenario: Voting Ensemble uses both linear and nonlinear models. Expected benefit?",
"options": [
"Soft Voting ignored",
"No benefit, models cancel each other",
"Capture complex patterns better than single model type",
"Ensemble fails"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Heterogeneous ensembles leverage strengths of diverse models."
},
{
"id": 85,
"questionText": "Scenario: You observe overfitting in ensemble predictions. Recommended step?",
"options": [
"Regularize base models and limit number of learners",
"Switch from Soft to Hard Voting",
"Ignore and keep current setup",
"Add more weak base models"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 0,
"explanation": "Controlling base model complexity reduces overfitting risk in the ensemble."
},
{
"id": 86,
"questionText": "Scenario: Voting Ensemble applied on noisy data. Best choice?",
"options": [
"Use only one model",
"Hard Voting may be more robust to noisy predictions",
"Ignore noise",
"Soft Voting always better"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Hard Voting reduces the effect of extreme probability fluctuations caused by noise."
},
{
"id": 87,
"questionText": "Scenario: You need explainability for the ensemble decision. Best choice?",
"options": [
"Single black-box model",
"Hard Voting with traceable majority votes",
"Soft Voting with unweighted averaging",
"Use random models"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Hard Voting provides clear insight into which class won the majority vote."
},
{
"id": 88,
"questionText": "Scenario: You want to minimize latency in ensemble inference. Recommended?",
"options": [
"Randomize predictions",
"Increase base models and use Soft Voting",
"Reduce number and complexity of base models",
"Always use Deep Neural Networks"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Fewer and simpler models decrease computation and latency while maintaining reasonable accuracy."
},
{
"id": 89,
"questionText": "Scenario: Base models trained with different feature subsets. Expected benefit?",
"options": [
"Reduced diversity",
"Ensemble ignored",
"Increased diversity and ensemble robustness",
"Soft Voting fails"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 2,
"explanation": "Different feature subsets create diverse predictions, improving ensemble performance."
},
{
"id": 90,
"questionText": "Scenario: You combine models with complementary strengths. Outcome?",
"options": [
"Enhanced performance compared to any single model",
"Ensemble fails",
"Performance drops",
"Only Hard Voting works"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 0,
"explanation": "Combining complementary models allows the ensemble to cover weaknesses of individual models."
},
{
"id": 91,
"questionText": "Scenario: Ensemble shows slightly worse performance than best base model. Reason?",
"options": [
"Hard Voting ignored",
"Models may be too correlated or weakly performing",
"Voting always reduces performance",
"Dataset too large"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "High correlation or weak base models can reduce ensemble benefit."
},
{
"id": 92,
"questionText": "Scenario: You want maximum interpretability with moderate performance. Best option?",
"options": [
"Random ensemble",
"Hard Voting with simple base models",
"Weighted Soft Voting with complex models",
"Single complex model"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Hard Voting with simple models is easier to interpret while maintaining decent performance."
},
{
"id": 93,
"questionText": "Scenario: Ensemble prediction differs from all base models. Possible reason?",
"options": [
"Hard Voting tie occurs",
"Impossible in Voting",
"Error in data preprocessing",
"Soft Voting probability averaging can yield a class different from all individual predictions"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Soft Voting averages probabilities, which may shift the final predicted class."
},
{
"id": 94,
"questionText": "Scenario: Using ensemble for critical medical diagnosis. Preferred setup?",
"options": [
"Hard Voting with weak models",
"Single uncalibrated model",
"Random Voting",
"Weighted Soft Voting with calibrated models"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Weighted Soft Voting ensures reliable models dominate the prediction, improving accuracy for high-stakes tasks."
},
{
"id": 95,
"questionText": "Scenario: Ensemble uses multiple similar trees. Soft Voting vs Hard Voting?",
"options": [
"Soft Voting always better",
"Hard Voting fails",
"Ensemble ignored",
"Little difference since models are correlated"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 3,
"explanation": "Highly correlated models provide minimal ensemble improvement, regardless of voting type."
},
{
"id": 96,
"questionText": "Scenario: You want to balance accuracy and latency. Recommendation?",
"options": [
"Reduce base models and consider simpler learners",
"Always Soft Voting",
"Ignore latency",
"Use all available models regardless of size"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 0,
"explanation": "Fewer and simpler models reduce latency while maintaining reasonable accuracy."
},
{
"id": 97,
"questionText": "Scenario: Ensemble uses probabilistic outputs from calibrated models. Expected outcome?",
"options": [
"Soft Voting fails",
"Improved prediction reliability using Soft Voting",
"Hard Voting fails",
"No difference"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Calibrated probabilities improve the effectiveness of Soft Voting."
},
{
"id": 98,
"questionText": "Scenario: Base models vary greatly in accuracy. Best Voting strategy?",
"options": [
"Hard Voting ignoring weights",
"Weighted Soft Voting to emphasize stronger models",
"Random selection",
"Remove weaker models"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Weighted Soft Voting allows stronger models to have more influence on the final prediction."
},
{
"id": 99,
"questionText": "Scenario: Ensemble shows high variance in predictions. Possible solution?",
"options": [
"Reduce number of base models",
"Increase diversity among base models",
"Switch to single model",
"Use uncalibrated probabilities"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Greater model diversity reduces correlated errors and stabilizes ensemble predictions."
},
{
"id": 100,
"questionText": "Scenario: You combine heterogeneous models using Voting Ensemble. Goal achieved?",
"options": [
"Hard Voting fails",
"Improved generalization and robustness over individual models",
"Soft Voting ignored",
"Reduced accuracy"
],
"correctAnswerIndex": 1,
"explanation": "Heterogeneous ensembles leverage complementary strengths, improving generalization and robustness."
}
]
}
|